Quasi-statically oriented, bi-directional tape recording head

ABSTRACT

In one general embodiment, an apparatus includes a magnetic head. The magnetic head has a first array of data transducers, a second array of data transducers spaced from the first array, and a third array of data transducers positioned between the first and second arrays. The magnetic head is positionable between a first position and a second position, where the longitudinal axis of the third array is positively or negatively angled relative to a line oriented perpendicular to an intended direction of tape travel thereacross when positioned towards the respective positions. Outer data transducers of the third array are about aligned with outer data transducers of the second array when the magnetic head is positioned towards the first position. The outer data transducers of the third array are about aligned with outer data transducers of the first array when the magnetic head is positioned towards the second position.

BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to data storage systems, and moreparticularly, this invention relates to a magnetic head and systemimplementing the same, where the head has offset arrays.

In magnetic storage systems, data is read from and written onto magneticrecording media utilizing magnetic transducers. Data is written on themagnetic recording media by moving a magnetic recording transducer to aposition over the media where the data is to be stored. The magneticrecording transducer then generates a magnetic field, which encodes thedata into the magnetic media. Data is read from the media by similarlypositioning the magnetic read transducer and then sensing the magneticfield of the magnetic media. Read and write operations may beindependently synchronized with the movement of the media to ensure thatthe data can be read from and written to the desired location on themedia.

An important and continuing goal in the data storage industry is that ofincreasing the density of data stored on a medium. For tape storagesystems, that goal has led to increasing the track and linear bitdensity on recording tape, and decreasing the thickness of the magnetictape medium. However, the development of small footprint, higherperformance tape drive systems has created various problems in thedesign of a tape head assembly for use in such systems.

In a tape drive system, magnetic tape is moved over the surface of thetape head at high speed. Usually the tape head is designed to minimizethe spacing between the head and the tape. The spacing between themagnetic head and the magnetic tape is crucial so that the recordinggaps of the transducers, which are the source of the magnetic recordingflux, are in near contact with the tape to effect writing sharptransitions, and so that the read element is in near contact with thetape to provide effective coupling of the magnetic field from the tapeto the read element.

The quantity of data stored on a magnetic tape may be increased byincreasing the number of data tracks across the tape. More tracks aremade possible by reducing feature sizes of the readers and writers, suchas by using thin-film fabrication techniques and magnetoresistive (MR)sensors. However, for various reasons, the feature sizes of readers andwriters cannot be arbitrarily reduced, and so factors such as lateraltape motion transients and tape lateral expansion and contraction (e.g.,perpendicular to the direction of tape travel) must be balanced withreader/writer sizes that provide acceptable written tracks and readbacksignals. One issue limiting areal density is misregistration caused bytape lateral expansion and contraction. Tape width can vary by up toabout 0.1% due to expansion and contraction caused by changes inhumidity, tape tension, temperature, aging etc. This is often referredto as tape dimensional stability (TDS), or more properly, tapedimensional instability (TDI).

If the tape is written in one environment and then read back in another,the TDI may prevent the spacing of the tracks on the tape from preciselymatching the spacing of the reading elements during readback. In currentproducts, the change in track spacing due to TDI is small compared tothe size of the written tracks and is part of the tracking budget thatis considered when designing a product. As the tape capacity increasesover time, tracks are becoming smaller and TDI is becoming anincreasingly larger portion of the tracking budget and this is alimiting factor for growing areal density.

BRIEF SUMMARY

An apparatus according to one embodiment includes a magnetic head. Themagnetic head has a first array of data transducers, a second array ofdata transducers spaced from the first array, and a third array of datatransducers positioned between the first and second arrays. The magnetichead is positionable between a first position and a second position. Alongitudinal axis of the third array has a negative angle relative to aline oriented perpendicular to an intended direction of tape travelthereacross when the magnetic head is in the first position. Thelongitudinal axis of the third array has a positive angle relative tothe line oriented perpendicular to the intended direction of tape travelthereacross when the magnetic head is in the second position. Outer datatransducers of the third array are about aligned with outer datatransducers of the second array when the magnetic head is positionedtowards the first position. The outer data transducers of the thirdarray are about aligned with outer data transducers of the first arraywhen the magnetic head is positioned towards the second position.

A computer program product for orienting a head, according to oneembodiment, includes a computer readable storage medium having programcode embodied therewith. The program code is readable/executable by acontroller to determine, by the controller, a desired pitch fortransducers of a magnetic head for reading and/or writing to a magnetictape. The magnetic head may be configured as in the previous paragraph.The program code is also readable/executable by the controller to causea mechanism to orient the magnetic head towards the first position toachieve the desired pitch when the tape travels in the first direction,where outer data transducers of the third array are about aligned withouter data transducers of the second array when the magnetic head ispositioned towards the first position. The program code is alsoreadable/executable by the controller to cause a mechanism to orient themagnetic head towards the second position to achieve the desired pitchwhen the tape travels in a second direction opposite the firstdirection, wherein the outer data transducers of the third array areabout aligned with outer data transducers of the first array when themagnetic head is positioned towards the second position.

Any of these embodiments may be implemented in a magnetic data storagesystem such as a tape drive system, which may include a magnetic head, adrive mechanism for passing a magnetic medium (e.g., recording tape)over the magnetic head, and a controller electrically coupled to themagnetic head.

Other aspects and embodiments of the present invention will becomeapparent from the following detailed description, which, when taken inconjunction with the drawings, illustrate by way of example theprinciples of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram of a simplified tape drive systemaccording to one embodiment.

FIG. 1B is a schematic diagram of a tape cartridge according to oneembodiment.

FIG. 2 illustrates a side view of a flat-lapped, bi-directional,two-module magnetic tape head according to one embodiment.

FIG. 2A is a tape bearing surface view taken from Line 2A of FIG. 2.

FIG. 2B is a detailed view taken from Circle 2B of FIG. 2A.

FIG. 2C is a detailed view of a partial tape bearing surface of a pairof modules.

FIG. 3 is a partial tape bearing surface view of a magnetic head havinga write-read-write configuration.

FIG. 4 is a partial tape bearing surface view of a magnetic head havinga read-write-read configuration.

FIG. 5 is a side view of a magnetic tape head with three modulesaccording to one embodiment where the modules all generally lie alongabout parallel planes.

FIG. 6 is a side view of a magnetic tape head with three modules in atangent (angled) configuration.

FIG. 7 is a side view of a magnetic tape head with three modules in anoverwrap configuration.

FIGS. 8A-8C are partial top-down views of one array of a magnetic tapehead according to one embodiment.

FIGS. 9A-9C are partial top-down views of one array of a magnetic tapehead according to one embodiment.

FIGS. 10A-10C are partial top-down views of a system with three arraysaccording to one embodiment.

FIG. 11A is a diagram of a tape with shingled tracks written in anon-serpentine fashion according to one embodiment.

FIG. 11B is a diagram of a tape with shingled tracks written in aserpentine fashion according to one embodiment.

FIG. 12 is a diagram of the system of FIGS. 10A-10C.

FIG. 13 is a flow chart of a method according to one embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description is made for the purpose of illustrating thegeneral principles of the present invention and is not meant to limitthe inventive concepts claimed herein. Further, particular featuresdescribed herein can be used in combination with other describedfeatures in each of the various possible combinations and permutations.

Unless otherwise specifically defined herein, all terms are to be giventheir broadest possible interpretation including meanings implied fromthe specification as well as meanings understood by those skilled in theart and/or as defined in dictionaries, treatises, etc.

It must also be noted that, as used in the specification and theappended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include pluralreferents unless otherwise specified.

The following description discloses several preferred embodiments ofmagnetic storage systems, as well as operation and/or component partsthereof.

In one general embodiment, an apparatus includes a magnetic head. Themagnetic head has a first array of data transducers, a second array ofdata transducers spaced from the first array, and a third array of datatransducers positioned between the first and second arrays. The magnetichead is positionable between a first position and a second position. Alongitudinal axis of the third array has a negative angle relative to aline oriented perpendicular to an intended direction of tape travelthereacross when the magnetic head is in the first position. Thelongitudinal axis of the third array has a positive angle relative tothe line oriented perpendicular to the intended direction of tape travelthereacross when the magnetic head is in the second position. Outer datatransducers of the third array are about aligned with outer datatransducers of the second array when the magnetic head is positionedtowards the first position. The outer data transducers of the thirdarray are about aligned with outer data transducers of the first arraywhen the magnetic head is positioned towards the second position.

In another general embodiment, a computer program product for orientinga head includes a computer readable storage medium having program codeembodied therewith. The program code is readable/executable by acontroller to determine, by the controller, a desired pitch fortransducers of a magnetic head for reading and/or writing to a magnetictape. The magnetic head may be configured as in the previous paragraph.The program code is also readable/executable by the controller to causea mechanism to orient the magnetic head towards the first position toachieve the desired pitch when the tape travels in the first direction,where outer data transducers of the third array are about aligned withouter data transducers of the second array when the magnetic head ispositioned towards the first position. The program code is alsoreadable/executable by the controller to cause a mechanism to orient themagnetic head towards the second position to achieve the desired pitchwhen the tape travels in a second direction opposite the firstdirection, wherein the outer data transducers of the third array areabout aligned with outer data transducers of the first array when themagnetic head is positioned towards the second position.

FIG. 1A illustrates a simplified tape drive 100 of a tape-based datastorage system, which may be employed in the context of the presentinvention. While one specific implementation of a tape drive is shown inFIG. 1A, it should be noted that the embodiments described herein may beimplemented in the context of any type of tape drive system.

As shown, a tape supply cartridge 120 and a take-up reel 121 areprovided to support a tape 122. One or more of the reels may form partof a removable cartridge and are not necessarily part of the system 100.The tape drive, such as that illustrated in FIG. 1A, may further includedrive motor(s) to drive the tape supply cartridge 120 and the take-upreel 121 to move the tape 122 over a tape head 126 of any type. Suchhead may include an array of readers, writers, or both.

Guides 125 guide the tape 122 across the tape head 126. Such tape head126 is in turn coupled to a controller 128 via a cable 130. Thecontroller 128, may be or include a processor and/or any logic forcontrolling any subsystem of the drive 100. For example, the controller128 typically controls head functions such as servo following, datawriting, data reading, etc. The controller 128 may operate under logicknown in the art, as well as any logic disclosed herein. The controller128 may be coupled to a memory 136 of any known type, which may storeinstructions executable by the controller 128. Moreover, the controller128 may be configured and/or programmable to perform or control some orall of the methodology presented herein. Thus, the controller may beconsidered configured to perform various operations by way of logicprogrammed into a chip; software, firmware, or other instructions beingavailable to a processor; etc. and combinations thereof.

The cable 130 may include read/write circuits to transmit data to thehead 126 to be recorded on the tape 122 and to receive data read by thehead 126 from the tape 122. An actuator 132 controls position of thehead 126 relative to the tape 122.

An interface 134 may also be provided for communication between the tapedrive 100 and a host (integral or external) to send and receive the dataand for controlling the operation of the tape drive 100 andcommunicating the status of the tape drive 100 to the host, all as willbe understood by those of skill in the art.

FIG. 1B illustrates an exemplary tape cartridge 150 according to oneembodiment. Such tape cartridge 150 may be used with a system such asthat shown in FIG. 1A. As shown, the tape cartridge 150 includes ahousing 152, a tape 122 in the housing 152, and a nonvolatile memory 156coupled to the housing 152. In some approaches, the nonvolatile memory156 may be embedded inside the housing 152, as shown in FIG. 1B. In moreapproaches, the nonvolatile memory 156 may be attached to the inside oroutside of the housing 152 without modification of the housing 152. Forexample, the nonvolatile memory may be embedded in a self-adhesive label154. In one preferred embodiment, the nonvolatile memory 156 may be aFlash memory device, ROM device, etc., embedded into or coupled to theinside or outside of the tape cartridge 150. The nonvolatile memory isaccessible by the tape drive and the tape operating software (the driversoftware), and/or other device.

By way of example, FIG. 2 illustrates a side view of a flat-lapped,bi-directional, two-module magnetic tape head 200 which may beimplemented in the context of the present invention. As shown, the headincludes a pair of bases 202, each equipped with a module 204, and fixedat a small angle α with respect to each other. The bases may be“U-beams” that are adhesively coupled together. Each module 204 includesa substrate 204A and a closure 204B with a thin film portion, commonlyreferred to as a “gap” in which the readers and/or writers 206 areformed. In use, a tape 208 is moved over the modules 204 along a media(tape) bearing surface 209 in the manner shown for reading and writingdata on the tape 208 using the readers and writers. The wrap angle θ ofthe tape 208 at edges going onto and exiting the flat media supportsurfaces 209 are usually between about 0.1 degree and about 5 degrees.

The substrates 204A are typically constructed of a wear resistantmaterial, such as a ceramic. The closures 204B made of the same orsimilar ceramic as the substrates 204A.

The readers and writers may be arranged in a piggyback or mergedconfiguration. An illustrative piggybacked configuration comprises a(magnetically inductive) writer transducer on top of (or below) a(magnetically shielded) reader transducer (e.g., a magnetoresistivereader, etc.), wherein the poles of the writer and the shields of thereader are generally separated. An illustrative merged configurationcomprises one reader shield in the same physical layer as one writerpole (hence, “merged”). The readers and writers may also be arranged inan interleaved configuration. Alternatively, each array of channels maybe readers or writers only. Any of these arrays may contain one or moreservo track readers for reading servo data on the medium.

FIG. 2A illustrates the tape bearing surface 209 of one of the modules204 taken from Line 2A of FIG. 2. A representative tape 208 is shown indashed lines. The module 204 is preferably long enough to be able tosupport the tape as the head steps between data bands.

In this example, the tape 208 includes 4 to 22 data bands, e.g., with 8data bands and 9 servo tracks 210, as shown in FIG. 2A on a one-halfinch wide tape 208. The data bands are defined between servo tracks 210.Each data band may include a number of data tracks, for example 1024data tracks (not shown). During read/write operations, the readersand/or writers 206 are positioned to specific track positions within oneof the data bands. Outer readers, sometimes called servo readers, readthe servo tracks 210. The servo signals are in turn used to keep thereaders and/or writers 206 aligned with a particular set of tracksduring the read/write operations.

FIG. 2B depicts a plurality of readers and/or writers 206 formed in agap 218 on the module 204 in Circle 2B of FIG. 2A. As shown, the arrayof readers and writers 206 includes, for example, 16 writers 214, 16readers 216 and two servo readers 212, though the number of elements mayvary. Illustrative embodiments include 8, 16, 32, 40, and 64 activereaders and/or writers 206 per array, and alternatively interleaveddesigns having odd numbers of reader or writers such as 17, 25, 33, etc.An illustrative embodiment includes 32 readers per array and/or 32writers per array, where the actual number of transducer elements couldbe greater, e.g., 33, 34, etc. This allows the tape to travel moreslowly, thereby reducing speed-induced tracking and mechanicaldifficulties and/or execute fewer “wraps” to fill or read the tape.While the readers and writers may be arranged in a piggybackconfiguration as shown in FIG. 2B, the readers 216 and writers 214 mayalso be arranged in an interleaved configuration. Alternatively, eacharray of readers and/or writers 206 may be readers or writers only, andthe arrays may contain one or more servo readers 212. As noted byconsidering FIGS. 2 and 2A-B together, each module 204 may include acomplementary set of readers and/or writers 206 for such things asbi-directional reading and writing, read-while-write capability,backward compatibility, etc.

FIG. 2C shows a partial tape bearing surface view of complimentarymodules of a magnetic tape head 200 according to one embodiment. In thisembodiment, each module has a plurality of read/write (R/W) pairs in apiggyback configuration formed on a common substrate 204A and anoptional electrically insulative layer 236. The writers, exemplified bythe write head 214 and the readers, exemplified by the read head 216,are aligned parallel to an intended direction of travel of a tape mediumthereacross to form an R/W pair, exemplified by the R/W pair 222. Notethat the intended direction of tape travel is sometimes referred toherein as the direction of tape travel, and such terms may be usedinterchangeable. Such direction of tape travel may be inferred from thedesign of the system, e.g., by examining the guides; observing theactual direction of tape travel relative to the reference point; etc.Moreover, in a system operable for bi-direction reading and/or writing,the direction of tape travel in both directions is typically paralleland thus both directions may be considered equivalent to each other.

Several R/W pairs 222 may be present, such as 8, 16, 32 pairs, etc. TheR/W pairs 222 as shown are linearly aligned in a direction generallyperpendicular to a direction of tape travel thereacross. However, thepairs may also be aligned diagonally, etc. Servo readers 212 arepositioned on the outside of the array of R/W pairs, the function ofwhich is well known.

Generally, the magnetic tape medium moves in either a forward or reversedirection as indicated by arrow 220. The magnetic tape medium and headassembly 200 operate in a transducing relationship in the mannerwell-known in the art. The piggybacked MR head assembly 200 includes twothin-film modules 224 and 226 of generally identical construction.

Modules 224 and 226 are joined together with a space present betweenclosures 204B thereof (partially shown) to form a single physical unitto provide read-while-write capability by activating the writer of theleading module and reader of the trailing module aligned with the writerof the leading module parallel to the direction of tape travel relativethereto. When a module 224, 226 of a piggyback head 200 is constructed,layers are formed in the gap 218 created above an electricallyconductive substrate 204A (partially shown), e.g., of AlTiC, ingenerally the following order for the R/W pairs 222: an insulating layer236, a first shield 232 typically of an iron alloy such as NiFe (—), CZTor Al—Fe—Si (Sendust), a sensor 234 for sensing a data track on amagnetic medium, a second shield 238 typically of a nickel-iron alloy(e.g., ˜80/20 at % NiFe, also known as permalloy), first and secondwriter pole tips 228, 230, and a coil (not shown). The sensor may be ofany known type, including those based on MR, GMR, AMR, tunnelingmagnetoresistance (TMR), etc.

The first and second writer poles 228, 230 may be fabricated from highmagnetic moment materials such as ˜45/55 NiFe. Note that these materialsare provided by way of example only, and other materials may be used.Additional layers such as insulation between the shields and/or poletips and an insulation layer surrounding the sensor may be present.Illustrative materials for the insulation include alumina and otheroxides, insulative polymers, etc.

The configuration of the tape head 126 according to one embodimentincludes multiple modules, preferably three or more. In awrite-read-write (W-R-W) head, outer modules for writing flank one ormore inner modules for reading. Referring to FIG. 3, depicting a W-R-Wconfiguration, the outer modules 252, 256 each include one or morearrays of writers 260. The inner module 254 of FIG. 3 includes one ormore arrays of readers 258 in a similar configuration. Variations of amulti-module head include a R-W-R head (FIG. 4), a R-R-W head, a W-W-Rhead, etc. In yet other variations, one or more of the modules may haveread/write pairs of transducers. Moreover, more than three modules maybe present. In further approaches, two outer modules may flank two ormore inner modules, e.g., in a W-R-R-W, a R-W-W-R arrangement, etc. Forsimplicity, a W-R-W head is used primarily herein to exemplifyembodiments of the present invention. One skilled in the art apprisedwith the teachings herein will appreciate how permutations of thepresent invention would apply to configurations other than a W-R-Wconfiguration.

FIG. 5 illustrates a magnetic head 126 according to one embodiment ofthe present invention that includes first, second and third modules 302,304, 306 each having a tape bearing surface 308, 310, 312 respectively,which may be flat, contoured, etc. Note that while the term “tapebearing surface” appears to imply that the surface facing the tape 315is in physical contact with the tape bearing surface, this is notnecessarily the case. Rather, only a portion of the tape may be incontact with the tape bearing surface, constantly or intermittently,with other portions of the tape riding (or “flying”) above the tapebearing surface on a layer of air, sometimes referred to as an “airbearing”. The first module 302 will be referred to as the “leading”module as it is the first module encountered by the tape in a threemodule design for tape moving in the indicated direction. The thirdmodule 306 will be referred to as the “trailing” module. The trailingmodule follows the middle module and is the last module seen by the tapein a three module design. The leading and trailing modules 302, 306 arereferred to collectively as outer modules. Also note that the outermodules 302, 306 will alternate as leading modules, depending on thedirection of travel of the tape 315.

In one embodiment, the tape bearing surfaces 308, 310, 312 of the first,second and third modules 302, 304, 306 lie on about parallel planes(which is meant to include parallel and nearly parallel planes, e.g.,between parallel and tangential as in FIG. 6), and the tape bearingsurface 310 of the second module 304 is above the tape bearing surfaces308, 312 of the first and third modules 302, 306. As described below,this has the effect of creating the desired wrap angle α_(z) of the taperelative to the tape bearing surface 310 of the second module 304.

Where the tape bearing surfaces 308, 310, 312 lie along parallel ornearly parallel yet offset planes, intuitively, the tape should peel offof the tape bearing surface 308 of the leading module 302. However, thevacuum created by the skiving edge 318 of the leading module 302 hasbeen found by experimentation to be sufficient to keep the tape adheredto the tape bearing surface 308 of the leading module 302. The trailingedge 320 of the leading module 302 (the end from which the tape leavesthe leading module 302) is the approximate reference point which definesthe wrap angle α_(z) over the tape bearing surface 310 of the secondmodule 304. The tape stays in close proximity to the tape bearingsurface until close to the trailing edge 320 of the leading module 302.Accordingly, read and/or write elements 322 may be located near thetrailing edges of the outer modules 302, 306. These embodiments areparticularly adapted for write-read-write applications.

A benefit of this and other embodiments described herein is that,because the outer modules 302, 306 are fixed at a determined offset fromthe second module 304, the inner wrap angle α₂ is fixed when the modules302, 304, 306 are coupled together or are otherwise fixed into a head.The inner wrap angle α₂ is approximately tan⁻¹(δ/W) where δ is theheight difference between the planes of the tape bearing surfaces 308,310 and W is the width between the opposing ends of the tape bearingsurfaces 308, 310. An illustrative inner wrap angle α₂ is in a range ofabout 0.5° to about 1.1°, though can be any angle required by thedesign.

Beneficially, the inner wrap angle α₂ may be set slightly less on theside of the module 304 receiving the tape (leading edge) than the innerwrap angle α₃ on the trailing edge, as the tape 315 rides above thetrailing module 306. This difference is generally beneficial as asmaller α₃ tends to oppose what has heretofore been a steeper exitingeffective wrap angle.

Note that the tape bearing surfaces 308, 312 of the outer modules 302,306 are positioned to achieve a negative wrap angle at the trailing edge320 of the leading module 302. This is generally beneficial in helpingto reduce friction due to contact with the trailing edge 320, providedthat proper consideration is given to the location of the crowbar regionthat forms in the tape where it peels off the head. This negative wrapangle also reduces flutter and scrubbing damage to the elements on theleading module 302. Further, at the trailing module 306, the tape 315flies over the tape bearing surface 312 so there is virtually no wear onthe elements when tape is moving in this direction. Particularly, thetape 315 entrains air and so will not significantly ride on the tapebearing surface 312 of the third module 306 (some contact may occur).This is permissible, because the leading module 302 is writing while thetrailing module 306 is idle.

Writing and reading functions are performed by different modules at anygiven time. In one embodiment, the second module 304 includes aplurality of data and optional servo readers 331 and no writers. Thefirst and third modules 302, 306 include a plurality of writers 322 andno readers, with the exception that the outer modules 302, 306 mayinclude optional servo readers. The servo readers may be used toposition the head during reading and/or writing operations. The servoreader(s) on each module are typically located towards the end of thearray of readers or writers.

By having only readers or side by side writers and servo readers in thegap between the substrate and closure, the gap length can besubstantially reduced. Typical heads have piggybacked readers andwriters, where the writer is formed above each reader. A typical gap is25-35 microns. However, irregularities on the tape may tend to droopinto the gap and create gap erosion. Thus, the smaller the gap is thebetter. The smaller gap enabled herein exhibits fewer wear relatedproblems.

In some embodiments, the second module 304 has a closure, while thefirst and third modules 302, 306 do not have a closure. Where there isno closure, preferably a hard coating is added to the module. Onepreferred coating is diamond-like carbon (DLC).

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 5, the first, second, and third modules302, 304, 306 each have a closure 332, 334, 336, which extends the tapebearing surface of the associated module, thereby effectivelypositioning the read/write elements away from the edge of the tapebearing surface. The closure 332 on the second module 304 can be aceramic closure of a type typically found on tape heads. The closures334, 336 of the first and third modules 302, 306, however, may beshorter than the closure 332 of the second module 304 as measuredparallel to a direction of tape travel over the respective module. Thisenables positioning the modules closer together. One way to produceshorter closures 334, 336 is to lap the standard ceramic closures of thesecond module 304 an additional amount. Another way is to plate ordeposit thin film closures above the elements during thin filmprocessing. For example, a thin film closure of a hard material such asSendust or nickel-iron alloy (e.g., 45/55) can be formed on the module.

With reduced-thickness ceramic or thin film closures 334, 336 or noclosures on the outer modules 302, 306, the write-to-read gap spacingcan be reduced to less than about 1 mm, e.g., about 0.75 mm, or 50% lessthan standard LTO tape head spacing. The open space between the modules302, 304, 306 can still be set to approximately 0.5 to 0.6 mm, which insome embodiments is ideal for stabilizing tape motion over the secondmodule 304.

Depending on tape tension and stiffness, it may be desirable to anglethe tape bearing surfaces of the outer modules relative to the tapebearing surface of the second module. FIG. 6 illustrates an embodimentwhere the modules 302, 304, 306 are in a tangent or nearly tangent(angled) configuration. Particularly, the tape bearing surfaces of theouter modules 302, 306 are about parallel to the tape at the desiredwrap angle α₂ of the second module 304. In other words, the planes ofthe tape bearing surfaces 308, 312 of the outer modules 302, 306 areoriented at about the desired wrap angle α_(z) of the tape 315 relativeto the second module 304. The tape will also pop off of the trailingmodule 306 in this embodiment, thereby reducing wear on the elements inthe trailing module 306. These embodiments are particularly useful forwrite-read-write applications. Additional aspects of these embodimentsare similar to those given above.

Typically, the tape wrap angles may be set about midway between theembodiments shown in FIGS. 5 and 6.

FIG. 7 illustrates an embodiment where the modules 302, 304, 306 are inan overwrap configuration. Particularly, the tape bearing surfaces 308,312 of the outer modules 302, 306 are angled slightly more than the tape315 when set at the desired wrap angle α₂ relative to the second module304. In this embodiment, the tape does not pop off of the trailingmodule, allowing it to be used for writing or reading. Accordingly, theleading and middle modules can both perform reading and/or writingfunctions while the trailing module can read any just-written data.Thus, these embodiments are preferred for write-read-write,read-write-read, and write-write-read applications. In the latterembodiments, closures should be wider than the tape canopies forensuring read capability. The wider closures will force a widergap-to-gap separation. Therefore a preferred embodiment has awrite-read-write configuration, which may use shortened closures thatthus allow closer gap-to-gap separation.

Additional aspects of the embodiments shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 are similarto those given above.

A 32 channel version of a multi-module head 126 may use cables 350having leads on the same pitch as current 16 channel piggyback LTOmodules, or alternatively the connections on the module may beorgan-keyboarded for a 50% reduction in cable span. Over-under, writingpair unshielded cables can be used for the writers, which may haveintegrated servo readers.

The outer wrap angles α₁ may be set in the drive, such as by guides ofany type known in the art, such as adjustable rollers, slides, etc. Forexample, rollers having an offset axis may be used to set the wrapangles. The offset axis creates an orbital arc of rotation, allowingprecise alignment of the wrap angle α₁.

To assemble any of the embodiments described above, conventional u-beamassembly can be used. Accordingly, the mass of the resultant head can bemaintained or even reduced relative to heads of previous generations. Inother approaches, the modules may be constructed as a unitary body.Those skilled in the art, armed with the present teachings, willappreciate that other known methods of manufacturing such heads may beadapted for use in constructing such heads.

As noted above, tape lateral expansion and contraction present manychallenges to increasing data track density on conventional products.Conventional products have attempted to compensate for tape lateralexpansion and contraction by reducing track pitch, controlling tapewidth by tension and improving the characteristics of the media itself.However, these methods fail to fully cancel the tape lateral expansionand contraction, and actually lead to other problems, including channelcrosstalk, tape stretch and media cost increases, respectively.

FIGS. 8A-8C are intended to depict the effect of tape lateral expansionand contraction on transducer arrays position relative thereto, and arein no way intended to limit the invention. FIG. 8A depicts an array 800relative to the tape 802, where the tape has a nominal width. As shown,the transducers 804 are favorably aligned with the data tracks 806 onthe tape 802. However, FIG. 8B illustrates the effect of tape lateralcontraction. As shown, contraction of the tape causes the data tracks tocontract as well, and the outermost transducers 808 are positioned alongthe outer edges of the outer data tracks as a result. Moreover, FIG. 8Cdepicts the effect of tape lateral expansion. Here expansion of the tapecauses the data tracks to move farther apart, and the outermosttransducers 808 are positioned along the inner edges of the outer datatracks as a result. If the tape lateral contraction is greater than thatshown in FIG. 8B, or the tape lateral expansion is greater than thatshown in FIG. 8C, the outermost transducers 808 will cross onto adjacenttracks, thereby causing the adjacent tracks to be overwritten during awriting operation and/or resulting in readback of the wrong track duringa readback operation. Moreover, running effects, such as tape skew andlateral shifting may exacerbate such problems, particularly for tapehaving shingled data tracks.

Thus, it would be desirable to develop a tape drive system able to readand/or write tracks onto the tape in the proper position, regardless ofthe extent of tape lateral expansion and/or contraction at any giventime. Various embodiments described and/or suggested herein overcome theforegoing challenges of conventional products, by orienting (equivalentto rotating, pivoting and/or tilting) at least three arrays of a tapedrive system, thereby selectively altering the pitch of the transducersin their arrays, as will soon become apparent.

By selectively orienting a module, the pitch of the transducers on themodule is thereby altered, preferably aligning the transducers with thetracks on a tape for a given tape lateral expansion and/or contraction.Tape contraction (shrinkage) can be dealt with by orienting a nominallynon-offset head, but tape expansion (dilation) cannot Thus, toaccommodate both shrinkage and dilation about a “nominal,” the head maybe statically oriented to a nominal angle of at least approximately 0.2°as will be explained below. Thereafter, smaller angular adjustments(e.g., about 1° or lower, but could be more) may be made to the alreadyoriented module in order to compensate for any variation of the tapelateral expansion and/or contraction, thereby keeping the transducersaligned with tracks on the tape.

FIGS. 9A-9C illustrate representational views of the effects oforienting an array having transducer arrays. It should be noted that theangles of orientation illustrated in FIGS. 9A-9C are exaggerated (e.g.,larger than would typically be observed), and are in no way intended tolimit the invention.

Referring to FIG. 9A, the array 900 is shown relative to the tape 902,where the tape has a nominal width. As illustrated, the array 900 isoriented at an angle θ_(nom) such that the transducers 904 are favorablyaligned with the data tracks 906 on the tape 902. However, when the tape902 experiences tape lateral contraction and/or expansion, the datatracks 906 on the tape contract and/or expand as well. As a result, thetransducers on the array are no longer favorably aligned with the datatracks 906 on the tape 902.

In FIG. 9B, the tape 902 has experienced tape lateral contraction.Therefore, in a manner exemplified by FIG. 8B, the transducers 904 onthe array 900 of FIG. 9B would no longer be favorably aligned with thedata tracks 906 on the tape 902 if no adjustment were made. However, asalluded to above, smaller angular adjustments may be made to the alreadyoriented array 900 in order to compensate for tape lateral contraction.Therefore, referring again to FIG. 9B, the angle of orientation >θ_(nom)of the array 900 is further oriented to an angle greater than θ_(nom).By increasing the angle of orientation >θ_(nom) the effective width w₂of the array of transducers decreases from the effective width w₁illustrated in FIG. 9A. This also translates to a reduction in theeffective pitch between the transducers, thereby realigning thetransducers along the contracted data tracks 906 on the tape 902 asshown in FIG. 9B.

On the other hand, when the tape experiences tape lateral expansion, thedata tracks on the tape expand as well. As a result, the transducers onthe array would no longer be favorably aligned with the data tracks onthe tape if no adjustments were made. With reference to FIG. 9C, thetape 902 has experienced tape lateral expansion. As a result, furtherangular adjustments may be made to the angle of orientation of the arrayin order to compensate for the tape lateral expansion. Therefore,referring again to FIG. 9C, the angle of orientation <θ_(nom) of thearray 900 is reduced to an angle less than θ_(nom). By decreasing theangle of orientation <θ_(nom) the effective width w₃ of the array oftransducers 904 increases from the effective width w₁ illustrated inFIG. 9A. Moreover, reducing the effective width of the array oftransducers 904 also causes the effective pitch between the transducersto be reduced, thereby realigning the transducers along the data tracks906 on the tape 902.

In a preferred approach, magnetic tape systems have three or morearrays, each having an array of transducers, typically in a row.Depending on the desired embodiment, the additional rows of transducersmay allow the system to read verify during the write process, but is notlimited thereto. In another approach, the three or more arrays may allowfor the system to accurately write data to a magnetic medium in aserpentine or non-serpentine fashion, as well as read back the datathereafter (explained in further detail below). As mentioned above, theforegoing conventional challenges may be overcome by orienting a givenarray or group of arrays, thereby selectively altering the pitch of thetransducers in the arrays to achieve such desired functionality andcompensating for the TDI.

By providing a system that compensates for tape lateral expansion and/orcontraction, various embodiments may enable use of wider readers,resulting in a better signal to noise ratio (SNR), and/or smaller datatracks, resulting in a higher capacity per unit area of the media.

FIGS. 10A-10C depict a system 1000 for compensating for tape lateralexpansion and/or contraction, in accordance with one embodiment. As anoption, the present system 1000 may be implemented in conjunction withfeatures from any other embodiment listed herein, such as thosedescribed with reference to the other FIGS. Of course, however, system1000 and others presented herein may be used in various applicationsand/or in permutations which may or may not be specifically described inthe illustrative embodiments listed herein. Further, the system 1000presented herein may be used in any desired environment.

Referring now to FIGS. 10A-10C, the system 1000 includes a magnetic head1002, which has arrays 1004, 1008, 1006 of data transducers 1010. Asillustrated the second array 1008 of data transducers is preferablyspaced form the first array 1004 of data transducers. Moreover, thethird array 1006 of data transducers is positioned between the first andsecond arrays 1004, 1008 of data transducers 1010. The spacing betweenthe arrays may preferably be minimized, but according to variousapproaches, may include any spacing configuration that would be apparentto one skilled in the art upon reading the present description. Each ofthe arrays may be on an individual module, e.g., as shown in FIGS. 3-7,may be formed on a common substrate, etc.

In a preferred approach, the data transducers 1010 of the first andsecond arrays 1004, 1008 may be of the same type, e.g., either readersor writers in both arrays, piggyback or merged transducers in botharrays, etc. This favorably allows the magnetic head 1002 the ability toread and/or write, as well as read-verify-while write, in bothdirections of tape travel 1022, as will soon become apparent. Moreover,the data transducers of the third array may preferably be different thanthose of the data transducers of the first and second arrays, therebyallowing the magnetic head to read-verify during the write process.Thus, according to the embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 10A-10C, the datatransducers 1010 of the first and second arrays 1004, 1008 preferablyinclude writers, while the data transducers of the third array 1006preferably include readers. However, in another approach, the datatransducers of the first and second arrays 1004, 1008 may includereaders, while the data transducers 1010 of the third array 1006 mayinclude writers. In such approach, the direction of tape travel 1022shown in FIGS. 10B and 10C would be opposite that shown.

With continued reference to FIGS. 10A-10C, the magnetic head 1002 ispreferably positionable, e.g., via pivoting, rotation, etc., between afirst position (FIG. 10B) and a second position (FIG. 10C). Depending onthe direction of tape travel and/or extent of tape lateral expansion orcontraction, the magnetic head 1002 may be positioned towards the firstor second position to read and/or write to the tape 902. This allows thesystem to control the effective transducer pitch presented to the tape,e.g., in a manner as described with reference to FIGS. 9B-9C.

Referring now to FIG. 10B, when the head 1002 is towards or in the firstposition, the longitudinal axis 1028 of the third array 1006 has anegative angle −φ relative to a line 1020 oriented perpendicular to anintended direction of tape travel 1022 thereacross. Thus, when themagnetic head 1002 is positioned towards the first position, the outerdata transducers of the third array 1006 are about aligned with outerdata transducers of the second array 1008, as illustrated. Moreover, theouter data transducers of the third and second arrays may preferably bealigned such that they are within the data tracks 906 on the tape 902,as illustrated. According to various approaches, when the head ispositioned towards the first position, the negative angle −φ may bebetween less than 0 and about −4°, more preferably between less than 0and about −6°, and ideally between less than 0 and about −8°.

With reference now to FIG. 10C, when the magnetic head 1002 is in ortowards the second position, the longitudinal axis 1028 of the thirdarray 1006 has a positive angle +φ relative to the line 1020 orientedperpendicular to the intended direction of tape travel 1022 thereacross.Thus, when the magnetic head 1002 is positioned towards the secondposition, the outer data transducers of the third array 1006 are aboutaligned with outer data transducers of the first array 1004, as shown.Furthermore, the outer data transducers of the third and first arraysare preferably aligned such that they are within the data tracks 906 onthe tape 902, as illustrated. According to various approaches, when thehead is positioned towards the second position, the positive angle +φmay be between greater than 0 and about 4°, more preferably betweengreater than 0 and about 6°, and ideally between greater than 0 andabout 8°.

Selection of the position of the head between the first and secondpositions may be selectable, and in some approaches continuously orperiodically adjusted, based at least in part on any desirable factor.In one approach, the extent of the angular orientation of the headtowards the first and/or second position may be made based on an extentof tape lateral expansion or contraction, e.g., in a similar manner tothat described above with reference to FIGS. 9A-9C. Additional factorsthat may be used to determine the angle of orientation of the head mayinclude detection of tape skew, direction of tape travel, etc.

Where the head is pivoted to set its angle of orientation, the center ofpivot of the head 1002 may extend through the module of the first orthird arrays 1004, 1006, with the head pivoting along the plane of tapetravel thereacross. For example, the pivot point may align with anintersection of the center of the first array 1004 and the axis 1024 ofthe first array. The position of the head may be adjusted using theactuator as necessary to position the active arrays over the appropriatetracks, e.g., based on servo signals.

In addition, the inventors have surprisingly and unexpectedly found thatthe various embodiments described below enable writing and reading thatdoes not steer the tape or cause media damage over the life of the tape.For example, the inventors expected the skiving edges of the arrays tosteer the tape laterally.

Angles of orientation greater than within a specified range (e.g.,greater than about 10°) may be undesirable as the higher angles causesteering of the tape. However, the angles of orientation within thespecified range unexpectedly and unforeseeably did not result insteering of the tape. Moreover, it is more difficult to distinguishbetween tape lateral expansion and/or contraction and skew when anglesof orientation of the modules is greater than within the specifiedrange. This may cause difficulties when matching the dimensionalconditions of the tape and/or titling state of the modules of thecurrent operation to that of the previous operation (explained infurther detail below). It should also be noted that the angle oforientation φ illustrated in FIG. 10B is exaggerated (e.g., larger thanwithin the desired range), and is in no way intended to limit theinvention.

It is preferable that, while writing data to adjoining data tracks,especially shingled data tracks, the same writer array is used for theadjoining data tracks. Different writer arrays are not typicallyidentical, as they have different alignment characteristics, andtherefore write data differently. For example, the write transducers ofone writer array may not have the same pitch, spacing, etc. as the writetransducers of another writer array. Thus, using multiple writer arraysto write data to adjoining data tracks may result in readback errors, asthe data written to the tracks may be aligned differently on each pass.According to another example, using different writer arrays writing datatracks may result in overwriting of data on an adjoining track, therebycausing data loss.

As a result, according to different embodiments, configurations havingthree arrays, e.g., Writer-Reader-Writer (WRW) or Reader-Writer-Reader(RWR), the head may preferably be oriented, e.g., to points between thefirst and second positions, reversibly as the tape direction is reversedwhile writing. This preferably ensures that the same writer array isused to write adjoining shingled data tracks, thereby minimizing futurereadback errors and enabling more symmetrical servo pattern reading,e.g., by performing more symmetrical shingled writing as will soonbecome apparent.

With continued reference to FIGS. 10A-10C, the system 1000 may include acontroller (see, e.g., 128 of FIG. 1, 1204 of FIG. 12). According to oneapproach, the controller may be configured to write data, using thehead, in a serpentine fashion. Moreover, according to another approach,the controller may be configured to write data, using the head, in anon-serpentine, e.g., linear azimuthal fashion, as will soon becomeapparent.

According to an illustrative approach, the arrays 1004, 1008, 1006 maypreferably have a RWR configuration (e.g., the data transducers of thefirst and second arrays 1004, 1008 include readers, wherein the datatransducers 1010 of the third array 1006 include writers) for conductingnon-serpentine writing. Non-serpentine writing preferably includes thearrays being oriented between a positive and negative angle for the twointended directions of tape travel as explained above. Moreover, the RWRconfiguration ensures that the same array 1008 writes adjacent tracks.Readers in the trailing array may be used to read-verify the writtendata.

Again, using a RWR configuration for non-serpentine writing allows thesame writer array to write each adjoining data track, despite reversalof the tape direction while writing thereto. This may reduce writingerrors, readback errors, data loss, etc., as well as reducing themisregistration budgeting requirements, as only one set of tracktolerances comes into play. Moreover, using the same writer array towrite adjoining data tracks ensures consistency while writing (e.g., byenabling symmetrical servo pattern reading), overall higher arealdensity, etc.

Thus, as illustrated in the representational diagram of FIG. 11A, whichis in no way intended to limit the invention, the angles of orientationof the magnetic transitions on the tape 902 may be different such thatthe magnetic transitions written in the shingled data tracks 1102 in onedirection are at a different angle than the magnetic transitions inshingled data tracks 1104 written in the opposite direction. Moreover,when reading a data track, the reader array may be oriented to aboutmatch the angle of the written transitions of each shingled data trackto read the data thereon. Thus, if the reader array drifts over one ofthe adjacent data tracks, the off-track reading rejection SNR is higher,because the angle of orientation of the magnetic transitions on theadjacent data track will not match the angle of orientation of the readarray.

Note that, while not ideal, a WRW configuration could be used fornon-serpentine writing in some approaches.

Referring again to FIGS. 10A-10C, according to another illustrativeapproach, the arrays may have a WRW configuration (e.g., the datatransducers 1010 of the first and second arrays 1004, 1008 may includewriters, wherein the data transducers of the third array 1006 mayinclude readers), for conducting serpentine writing. While writing datawith a WRW configuration, the leading writer and reader may preferablybe active, while the trailing writer is not active, depending on theintended direction of tape travel. As a result, the leading writer arraymay be used to write adjoining data tracks for one direction of tapetravel, while the trailing writer array may be used to write adjoiningdata tracks for the other direction of tape travel.

Thus, as illustrated in the representational diagram of FIG. 11B, whichis in no way intended to limit the invention, the angles of orientationof the magnetic transitions on the tape 902 may be about the same forshingled data tracks 1102 written in a first direction of tape travel,but different than the angles of orientation of the magnetic transitionsin the shingled data tracks 1104 written during the opposite directionof tape travel. This preferably reduces writing errors, readback errors,data loss, etc. and ensures consistency while writing, e.g., by enablingsymmetrical servo pattern reading.

According to yet another approach, the arrays may have a RWRconfiguration as described above, for conducting serpentine writing.While writing data with a RWR configuration, the writer andcorresponding trailing reader may preferably be active, while theleading reader is not active, depending on the direction of tape travel.As a result, the same writer may be used to write each adjoining datatrack for both directions of tape travel, despite reversal thereof whilewriting.

Referring again to FIGS. 10A-10C, which is in no way intended to limitthe invention, the arrays 1004, 1006, 1008 are preferably fixed relativeto each other, such that their respective axes 1024, 1028, 1026 areoriented about parallel to each other, respectively (see also FIG. 12).As illustrated in FIGS. 10A-10C, the axes 1024, 1028, 1026 of each arrayof transducers are represented by the dashed lines that lie betweenopposite ends thereof, e.g., ends of the array positioned farthestapart.

However, in some embodiments, the relative position of the third array1006 to the first and second arrays 1004, 1008 may be selectivelyadjustable in a direction parallel to the longitudinal axis 1028 of thethird array 1006 (see offset of FIG. 12). According to one approach, thethird array 1006 may be nominally shifted relative to the first andsecond arrays 1004, 1008. However, in another approach, the first andsecond arrays 1004, 1008 may be nominally shifted relative to the thirdarray 1006.

Being selectively adjustable in a direction parallel to the longitudinalaxis 1028 of the third array 1006 may allow the transducers of the thirdarray to better align with the transducers of the first and/or secondarrays at any given angle of orientation. According to one approach,this selective adjustability may preferably allow the already-orientedarrays to compensate for tape lateral expansion and/or contraction, tapeskew, shifting of the tape, etc., e.g., experienced during operation ofthe head.

Depending on the desired embodiment, the third array 1006 itself may beoffset (e.g., nominally offset) to effect the shifting of the transducerarrays, as shown by the offset (offset) in FIG. 12. In another approach,the transducer arrays may be positioned on the respective array in aspecified position to effect an offset while the arrays themselves arenot offset in the drive. Combinations of the foregoing are alsopossible.

However, offsetting the arrays such that the first and second arrays1004, 1008 (outer arrays) are offset in the same direction relative tothe third array 1006 (central array), goes against conventional wisdom.As a result, the inventors have surprisingly found that offsetting thearrays in this manner actually enables a smaller head envelope, allowingfor compatibility with legacy assembly components and/or fixtures,thereby reducing associated cost. The inventors have additionally foundthat offsetting the arrays in this manner enables symmetrical servopattern reading, as described above. Symmetrical servo pattern readingis desirable in that it potentially simplifies the decoding of tape skewand tape dimensional changes, since the signals have the samerelationship to one another for both intended direction of tape travel.

In yet another approach, the arrays of transducers may include one ormore chiplets. According to one approach, one, two or three the arraysof transducers may be in one or more chiplets, which may be thin filmstructures that are smaller than the array itself, and coupled thereto.A chiplet may include at least one of: a read transducer and a writetransducer, or any combination thereof. Moreover, a chiplet ispreferably coupled to a carrier, the carrier providing a portion of thetape bearing surface. In different approaches, a chiplet may be coupledto the carrier using an adhesive, an electrostatically dissipativeadhesive, or any other coupling mechanism which would be apparent to oneskilled in the art upon reading the present description. Moreover, oneor more of the chiplets may be longitudinally positioned aboutperpendicular to the intended direction of tape travel, or at an anglerelative thereto. A chiplet may be an independently formed chip that wascreated separately from the carrier, or a chip formed on the carrier butnot extending full span (i.e., the full span of the magnetic tapepassing thereacross).

With reference to FIG. 12, the system 1200 includes a mechanism 1202,such as a tape dimensional instability compensation mechanism fororienting the arrays to control a transducer pitch presented to a tape.The tape dimensional instability compensation mechanism 1202 preferablyallows for orienting the arrays while the arrays are reading and/orwriting. The tape dimensional instability compensation mechanism 1202may be any known mechanism suitable for orienting the arrays.Illustrative tape dimensional instability compensation mechanisms 1202include worm screws, voice coil actuators, thermal actuators,piezoelectric actuators, etc.

With continued reference to FIG. 12, the tape dimensional instabilitycompensation mechanism 1202 may be coupled to a preferably rigid beam1206 that is attached to the arrays at different locations. Asillustrated, the beam 1206 may be attached to the arrays at one end 1208of the outer arrays 1004, 1008, and at the opposite end 1210 of theinner array 1006, which is nominally shifted.

Moreover, according to an illustrative approach, which is in no wayintended to limit the invention, the arrays 1004, 1006, 1008 may haveslots 1212 in them and a spring 1214 formed therein by gluing an e.g.,metal sheet between the arrays and into the two opposing slots. Thistechnique is described in more detail in U.S. patent application Ser.No. 13/026,142 filed Feb. 11, 2011 to Hamidi et al., which is hereinincorporated by reference. As a result, the arrays may preferably befixed such that their longitudinal axes 1024, 1026, 1028 are orientedabout parallel to each other, as explained above.

Referring still to FIG. 12, a controller 1204 may be electricallycoupled to the magnetic head. Moreover, the controller may be configuredto control the tape dimensional instability compensation mechanism 1202based on a readback signal of the tape, e.g., servo signals, datasignals, a combination of both, etc. As described above, according todifferent approaches, the controller 1204 may be configured to writedata using the head in a non-serpentine and/or serpentine fashion,depending on the desired embodiment. However, in different approaches,the controller may include any approaches described and/or suggestedherein, depending on the desired embodiment (see 128 of FIG. 1).

Moreover, in various approaches, the dimensional conditions of the tapeand/or titling state of the arrays when the tape was written may beretrieved e.g., from a database, cartridge memory, etc., and theorientation of the arrays may be set based thereon to about match thetransducer pitch of the current operation to that of the previousoperation.

In various approaches, additional logic, computer code, commands, etc.,or combinations thereof, may be used to control the tape dimensionalinstability compensation mechanism 1202 for adjusting the orientation ofthe arrays, e.g., based on a skew of the tape. Moreover, any of theembodiments described and/or suggested herein may be combined withvarious functional methods, depending on the desired embodiment.

FIG. 13 depicts a method 1300 for orienting arrays having transducers,in accordance with one embodiment. Such method 1300 may be implementedby the controller of FIGS. 1 and/or 12. As an option, the present method1300 may be implemented in conjunction with features from any otherembodiment listed herein, such as those described with reference to theother FIGS. Of course, however, such method 1300 and others presentedherein may be used in various applications and/or in permutations whichmay or may not be specifically described in the illustrative embodimentslisted herein. Further, the method 1300 presented herein may be used inany desired environment. Thus FIG. 13 (and the other FIGS.) should bedeemed to include any and all possible permutations.

Referring now to FIG. 13, the method 1300 includes determining a desiredpitch for transducers of a head for reading and/or writing to a magnetictape, the head having a first array of data transducers, a second arrayof data transducers spaced from the first array, and a third array ofdata transducers positioned between the first and second arrays, themagnetic head being positionable between a first position and a secondposition, wherein a longitudinal axis of the third array has a negativeangle relative to a line oriented perpendicular to a first direction oftape travel thereacross when the head is in the first position, whereinthe longitudinal axis of the third array has a positive angle relativeto the line oriented perpendicular to the first direction of tape travelthereacross when the head is in the second position. See operation 1302.As described above, reading and/or writing to a magnetic tape may bedone in a serpentine, non-serpentine, etc. fashion.

Moreover, operation 1304 of method 1300 includes orienting the headtowards the first position to achieve the desired pitch when the tapetravels in the first direction. Outer data transducers of the thirdarray are about aligned with outer data transducers of the second arraywhen the head is positioned towards the first position. See, e.g., FIG.10B.

Additionally, the method 1300 includes orienting the head towards thesecond position to achieve the desired pitch when the tape travels in asecond direction opposite the first direction, wherein the outer datatransduces of the third array are about aligned with outer datatransducers of the first array when the head is positioned towards thesecond position. See operation 1306. See, e.g., FIG. 10C.

Although three arrays 1004, 1008, 1006 are illustrated in combination inthe magnetic head 1002 in FIGS. 10A-12, in other approaches, a magnetichead may include any number of arrays e.g., at least three, at leastfour, a plurality, etc. depending on the desired embodiment. Moreover,the arrays may be positioned with any orientation relative to eachother, depending on the desired embodiment.

Moreover, according to different approaches, with reference to any ofthe embodiments listed and/or suggested herein, the arrays may be formedin a single, (e.g., monolithic) head. In another approach, which is inno way intended to limit the invention, the arrays may be formed on acommon substrate, and may be cut (e.g., separated) depending on thedesired embodiment.

It will be clear that the various features of the foregoing systemsand/or methodologies may be combined in any way, creating a plurality ofcombinations from the descriptions presented above.

As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, aspects of the presentinvention may be embodied as a system, method or computer programproduct. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the formof an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment(including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or anembodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may allgenerally be referred to herein as “logic,” a “circuit,” “module,” or“system.” Furthermore, aspects of the present invention may take theform of a computer program product embodied in one or more computerreadable medium(s) having computer readable program code embodiedthereon.

Any combination of one or more computer readable medium(s) may beutilized. The computer readable medium may be a computer readable signalmedium or a non-transitory computer readable storage medium. A computerreadable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, anelectronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, orsemiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combinationof the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of thenon-transitory computer readable storage medium include the following: aportable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), aread-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROMor Flash memory), a portable compact disc read-only memory (e.g.,CD-ROM), a Blu-ray disc read-only memory (BD-ROM), an optical storagedevice, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of theforegoing. In the context of this document, a non-transitory computerreadable storage medium may be any tangible medium that is capable ofcontaining, or storing a program or application for use by or inconnection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

A computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signalwith computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, inbaseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may takeany of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to,electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. Acomputer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium thatis not a non-transitory computer readable storage medium and that cancommunicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or inconnection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device,such as an electrical connection having one or more wires, an opticalfibre, etc.

Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmittedusing any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless,wireline, optical fibre cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination ofthe foregoing.

Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of thepresent invention may be written in any combination of one or moreprogramming languages, including an object oriented programming languagesuch as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional proceduralprogramming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similarprogramming languages. The program code may execute entirely on theuser's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alonesoftware package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remotecomputer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latterscenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computerthrough any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or awide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an externalcomputer, for example through the Internet using an Internet ServiceProvider (ISP).

Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference toflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus(systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of theinvention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchartillustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in theflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented bycomputer program instructions. These computer program instructions maybe provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, specialpurpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus toproduce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via theprocessor of the computer or other programmable data processingapparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified inthe flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.

These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computerreadable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable dataprocessing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particularmanner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readablemedium produce an article of manufacture including instructions whichimplement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks.

The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer,other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to causea series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, otherprogrammable apparatus or other devices to produce a computerimplemented process such that the instructions which execute on thecomputer or other programmable apparatus provide processes forimplementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart(s) and/orblock diagram block or blocks.

It will be further appreciated that embodiments of the present inventionmay be provided in the form of a service deployed on behalf of acustomer.

While various embodiments have been described above, it should beunderstood that they have been presented by way of example only, and notlimitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of an embodiment of the presentinvention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplaryembodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the followingclaims and their equivalents.

What is claimed is:
 1. An apparatus, comprising: a magnetic head, themagnetic head having: a first array of data transducers; a second arrayof data transducers spaced from the first array; a third array of datatransducers positioned between the first and second arrays, the magnetichead being positionable between a first position and a second position,wherein a longitudinal axis of the third array has a negative anglerelative to a line oriented perpendicular to an intended direction oftape travel thereacross when the magnetic head is in the first position,wherein the longitudinal axis of the third array has a positive anglerelative to the line oriented perpendicular to the intended direction oftape travel thereacross when the magnetic head is in the secondposition, wherein outer data transducers of the third array are aboutaligned with outer data transducers of the second array when themagnetic head is positioned towards the first position; wherein theouter data transducers of the third array are about aligned with outerdata transducers of the first array when the magnetic head is positionedtowards the second position.
 2. An apparatus as recited in claim 1,wherein the negative angle is between less than 0 and about −8° when themagnetic head is positioned towards the first position.
 3. An apparatusas recited in claim 1, wherein the positive angle is between greaterthan 0 and about 8° when the magnetic head is positioned towards thesecond position.
 4. An apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the datatransducers of the first and second arrays are readers, wherein the datatransducers of the third array are writers.
 5. An apparatus as recitedin claim 4, further comprising a controller configured to write datausing the magnetic head in a non-serpentine fashion.
 6. An apparatus asrecited in claim 4, further comprising a controller configured to writedata using the magnetic head in a serpentine fashion.
 7. An apparatus asrecited in claim 1, wherein the data transducers of the first and secondarrays are writers, wherein the data transducers of the third array arereaders.
 8. An apparatus as recited in claim 7, further comprising acontroller configured to write data using the magnetic head in aserpentine fashion.
 9. An apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein aposition of the third array relative to the first and second arrays isselectively adjustable in a direction parallel to the longitudinal axisof the third array.
 10. An apparatus as recited in claim 1, furthercomprising: a drive mechanism for passing a magnetic medium over themagnetic head; and a controller electrically coupled to the magnetichead.
 11. A computer program product for orienting a head, the computerprogram product comprising a computer readable storage medium havingprogram code embodied therewith, the program code readable/executable bya controller to: determine, by the controller, a desired pitch fortransducers of a magnetic head for reading and/or writing to a magnetictape, the magnetic head having a first array of data transducers, asecond array of data transducers spaced from the first array, and athird array of data transducers positioned between the first and secondarrays, the magnetic head being positionable between a first positionand a second position, wherein a longitudinal axis of the third arrayhas a negative angle relative to a line oriented perpendicular to afirst direction of tape travel thereacross when the magnetic head is inthe first position, wherein the longitudinal axis of the third array hasa positive angle relative to the line oriented perpendicular to thefirst direction of tape travel thereacross when the magnetic head is inthe second position; cause a mechanism to orient the magnetic headtowards the first position to achieve the desired pitch when the tapetravels in the first direction, wherein outer data transducers of thethird array are about aligned with outer data transducers of the secondarray when the magnetic head is positioned towards the first position;cause a mechanism to orient the magnetic head towards the secondposition to achieve the desired pitch when the tape travels in a seconddirection opposite the first direction, wherein the outer datatransducers of the third array are about aligned with outer datatransducers of the first array when the magnetic head is positionedtowards the second position.
 12. A computer program product as recitedin claim 11, wherein the negative angle is between less than 0 and about−8° when the magnetic head is positioned towards the first position,wherein the positive angle is between greater than 0 and about 8° whenthe magnetic head is positioned towards the second position.
 13. Acomputer program product as recited in claim 11, wherein the datatransducers of the first and second arrays are readers, wherein the datatransducers of the third array are writers.
 14. A computer programproduct as recited in claim 13, further comprising program code forcausing writing data in a non-serpentine fashion.
 15. A computer programproduct as recited in claim 13, further comprising program code forcausing writing data in a serpentine fashion.
 16. A computer programproduct as recited in claim 11, wherein the data transducers of thefirst and second arrays are writers, wherein the data transducers of thethird array are readers.
 17. A computer program product as recited inclaim 16, further comprising program code for causing writing data in aserpentine fashion.
 18. A computer program product as recited in claim11, further comprising program code for causing selective adjustment ofa position of the third array relative to the first and second arrays ina direction parallel to the longitudinal axis of the third array.